Technopolitical Blog
Cognitive Warfare: Your Brain Is a Front Line
How the concept of "cognitive warfare" moved from science fiction to official military doctrine — and why it concerns you, even if you never go to war.
Key takeaways:
- In July 2026, NATO, the Chinese military, and Western think tanks simultaneously published cognitive warfare doctrines
- Cognitive warfare does not aim to destroy the enemy but to paralyze its capacity to decide
- The same technologies (smartphones, social media, generative AI) are the vectors of this war — for civilians and military alike
- Understanding the mechanism is the first act of defense
2. The Concept: A War That Does Not Destroy, but Paralyzes
Cognitive warfare is often confused with disinformation, fake news, or propaganda. It is not the same thing, and this confusion is the first vulnerability.
Where Does the Concept Come From?
The term was popularized by James Giordano, neuroscientist and professor of bioethics at Georgetown University. In 2018, during a lecture at West Point, he uttered a phrase that would become foundational:
"The human brain is the battlefield of the 21st century."
Asma Mhalla, political scientist and lecturer at Sciences Po and Polytechnique, takes up and develops this concept in her book Technopolitique : comment la technologie fait de nous des soldats (Seuil, 2022). She devotes Chapter 5 — De la guerre cognitive en démocratie — to detailing the mechanisms. Watch the lecture | Watch the FRANCE 24 interview
A NATO report, cited by Asma Mhalla in her book, defines the objective of cognitive operations as follows:
"To attack, exploit, degrade, or even destroy the representations, the fabric of mental trust, the belief in established logics necessary for the healthy functioning of a group, a society, or even a nation."
— NATO report, cited in Technopolitique (page 123)
The Fundamental Difference
| Type | Target | Objective | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Propaganda | Information | Influence opinion | Posters, speeches |
| Disinformation | Information | Deceive | Fake news, deepfakes |
| Information warfare | Information | Destabilize | Hacking, leaks |
| Cognitive warfare | Cognition | Paralyze discernment | Saturation, double bind |
Asma Mhalla puts it this way:
"Information warfare manipulates content (fake news, deepfakes). Cognitive warfare manipulates the very reception of content by the brain — paralysis of discernment, capture of emotions and biases."
— Lecture Technopolitique, Mollat Bordeaux Video source
The goal is not to make you believe a lie rather than a truth. It is to prevent you from distinguishing one from the other, through saturation, cognitive exhaustion, and the destruction of trust in the institutions that produce truth.
3. In Practice: Three Mechanisms at Work
3.1. Cognitive Saturation — A Strategy of Governance
In her essay Cyberpunk : le nouveau système totalitaire (Seuil, 2025), Asma Mhalla describes what she calls the dictatorship of flows:
"Democracy has become the dictatorship of permanent flows — one flow chases out the next, nothing holds equal weight, the citizen becomes a content addict*."*
— Lecture Cyberpunk Video source
The mechanism is simple and diabolically effective: when everything is urgent, nothing is. Informational saturation prevents any autonomous reflection, any critical distance, any sense of hope. The system, says Asma Mhalla, "keeps you occupied until you no longer know how to think for yourself."
This is not a theory. Max Fisher, journalist at the New York Times, documents in The Chaos Machine (2022) how social platform algorithms structurally amplify polarization and political violence — not by accident, but by design. Source
3.2. The Double Bind — The Orwellian Weapon of the 21st Century
Asma Mhalla draws on Orwell's concept of doublethink: "the faculty of holding simultaneously two contradictory beliefs and accepting both of them."
But she adds another layer: the double bind, popularized by Gregory Bateson. This is a situation in which one receives two contradictory injunctions with no way of stepping outside the frame:
"Trump's new deal: he creates a parallel reality that becomes the sole object of public debate, diverting attention from actual facts."
— FRANCE 24 interview Video source
The example given by Asma Mhalla is illuminating: American cities portrayed as Sodom and Gomorrah in public discourse, while local data contradicts this narrative. Public debate then centers on the validity of the narrative, not on the reality of the cities.
Peter Pomerantsev, in This Is Not Propaganda (2019), documents how this technique has become the hallmark of modern information wars, from Russia to the United States. The objective is not to persuade but to paralyze. Source
3.3. Dual-Use Technologies — Your Smartphone Is a Weapon
One of Asma Mhalla's most striking contributions is the concept of the civil-military duality of technologies:
"Your smartphone, your apps, your data are simultaneously civilian and military. Cambridge Analytica (2016) was the first mass cognitive war: the capture of psychographic data to orient and suppress the vote."
— Lecture Technopolitique Video source
The Cambridge Analytica precedent (2016) — 87 million Facebook profiles harvested to influence the American elections and the Brexit referendum — was not an accident. It was a prototype. Bruce Schneier, cybersecurity expert, analyzes in A Hacker's Mind (2023) how systems are designed to be subverted. Source
4. And Tomorrow? — An Asymmetric Battlefield
Cognitive warfare poses a structural problem for democracies. As Asma Mhalla points out:
"Democracies are vulnerable because manipulation operates in gray zones — neither peace nor war — below the threshold that triggers legal defenses. Freedom of expression becomes a weakness when facing actors who are not bound by such constraints."
— Lecture Technopolitique Video source
General Thierry Burkhard, Chief of Staff of the French Armed Forces, has explicitly acknowledged that the classic Peace-Crisis-War cycle is no longer relevant, replaced by Competition-Contestation-Confrontation. [Source: Technopolitique, page 179]
The NATO report cited above adds a troubling dimension: cognitive operations aim to destroy "the fabric of mental trust" necessary for a society to function. In other words, the objective is not to win a battle of opinion — it is to render society incapable of functioning.
What Is to Be Done?
Asma Mhalla does not stop at diagnosis. In Cyberpunk, she proposes thirteen exercises for the free mind, a manual of cognitive resistance:
"The first act of resistance is to name things in order to reclaim power. What follows is the discipline of curiosity, resistance to fatigue and indifference."
— Lecture Cyberpunk Video source
Among these exercises: educating your algorithms, disrupting the system's gears, reading, walking, meeting in person — because "the real world is the space of resistance."
"Smartphones are not portals to the world but psychic prisons within the universe of the architects of these tools."
— Lecture Cyberpunk, citing Kady and Tim Berners-Lee Video source
📚 Sources
🎬 Videos (transcripts and distillations available in the Hub)
| Source | Link | Content |
|---|---|---|
| Asma Mhalla — Cyberpunk (full lecture) | YouTube | 1h20 — key concepts, Dileviathan, resistance |
| Asma Mhalla — Technopolitique (Mollat lecture) | YouTube | 1h20 — cognitive warfare, Big Tech, ideologies |
| Asma Mhalla — FRANCE 24 | YouTube | 12 min — dystopia, cognitive totalitarianism |
📄 Intelligence Articles (July 2026)
| Source | Link | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| War on the Rocks (07/22) | Read | Chinese cognitive doctrine against Taiwan |
| Small Wars Journal (07/27) | Read | Countermeasures to alchemic warfare |
| NAOC / NATO Association (07/25) | Read | NATO framing of cognitive warfare |
| Naval War College Review (07/21) | Read | Cognitive dimension of mobilization |
| Zona Militar (07/22) | Read | Cognitive operation against Messi — case study |
📕 Reference Works
| Work | Author | Year | Publisher |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technopolitique | Asma Mhalla | 2022 | Seuil |
| Cyberpunk : le nouveau système totalitaire | Asma Mhalla | 2025 | Seuil |
| The Chaos Machine | Max Fisher | 2022 | Little, Brown |
| This Is Not Propaganda | Peter Pomerantsev | 2019 | PublicAffairs |
| A Hacker's Mind | Bruce Schneier | 2023 | W.W. Norton |
| The Age of Surveillance Capitalism | Shoshana Zuboff | 2019 | PublicAffairs |
Publié le August 13, 2026 par Christophe Wiest
Articles similaires
Foreign Interference: A Year Before the Presidential Election, the Cognitive War Has Already Begun
Three candidates targeted in ten days.
24 août 2026
Big Tech vs. the State: Who Really Governs the Digital World?
X/Twitter Decides Who Gets to Speak. Google Knows Where You're Going. SpaceX Controls Internet Access in Wartime. Do States Still Have the Final Say?
10 août 2026
Reality Outruns Fiction: Raphaël Glucksmann Destabilised by Russian Services?
On August 4, 2026, Raphaël Glucksmann published a long post on X: he said he had been the target of a destabilisation operation attributed to the "Russian services."
5 août 2026